"Bright Star" by John Keats

In "Bright Star," Keats immediately introduces us to the speaker in the first line, as the speaker muses, “bright star, would I were steadfast as thou art—,” indicating that they desperately yearn to acquire the same unfaltering and determined nature as a star in the sky, undying and eternal. In the very first line of the poem, Keats gives life to the star, which is depicted through the use of an apostrophe (addressing something nonhuman) so as to illuminate how the speaker’s soul is void of any flawless star-like qualities that are so sought-after. Moreover, the speaker acknowledges the star’s solitude, adding that he/she does not long to be “in lone splendor hung aloft the night,” which simultaneously evokes the star’s magnificence in its eternal existence. Keats’ solemn and somber tone vividly captures the speaker’s profound longing and despondency. The speaker bluntly asserts that in addition to not wanting to exist in isolation, he refuses to be an observer like the star, “with eternal lids apart.” Once more, Keats depicts the star as a living thing, giving it eyes that watch down upon the world endlessly. The speaker in the poem does not wish to possess the star’s ability to gaze at the world interminably, for it may be unbearable. The speaker declares that the star watches, “like nature’s patient, sleepless Eremite,” which Keats structures using a simile in order to suggest that the speaker does not seek to remain restless and sheltered indefinitely like an “Eremite,” or a hermit. Yet the speaker goes on to vividly illustrate what the bright star observes from the sky, such as the “moving waters at their priestlike task/of pure ablution round earth’s human shores,” which serves to encompass the transience and ephemerality of life as water constantly cleanses the earth’s shores. Keats intentionally describes the waters as capable of “ablution,” or cleansing and ritual washing, in order to reveal the cyclical and never-ending aspect of life in its entirety. In addition to overseeing the sweeping ocean, the speaker believes the star to be “gazing on the new soft fallen mask/of snow upon the mountains and the moors—,” which has underlying implications of purity and virtue in that snow is white and fresh. Likewise, the speaker implies that they do not want to watch the oceans and mountains patiently from above for all eternity, but that they would rather be “pillowed upon [their] fair love’s ripening breast” in a world in which cold, unfeeling purity is absent and instead replaced by a warm and welcoming lover’s chest. Here, Keats creates a striking contrast between the harsh and desolate nature of the frozen “mountains and the moors,” and the pleasant and blooming sphere of passionate love. The speaker remains dedicated to “love’s ripening breast,” longing “to feel forever its soft fall and swell,” which alludes to the permanence of the star’s existence in the sky “forever.” In effect, Keats denotes the speaker’s confliction in defining their heart’s true desire, which seems to be entangled in a profound uncertainty of whether to live in eternal isolation or indulge in a transitory love affair. Overall, Keats encapsulates the shift in the speaker’s thoughts as the speaker resolves to sacrifice the unfeasible ability to live an eternal life such as the bright star, which seemed to be so endearing at first, and instead, invest in a transitory, but meaningful notion of love and a passionate affair. Essentially, Keats exemplifies the impracticality of seeking to attain a state of immortality, such as the bright star that shines eternally in the sky, by exposing the inherent desire of an indecisive man who deeply wishes to possess the benefits of both worlds. However, in a world where eternal existence is impossible, which the speaker must mournfully accept, humans must settle on the next best thing, a seemingly undying love that lives forever, “or else swoon to death.”    

"in Just--" by e.e. cummings

This week in class, we discussed “in Just—" by e. e. cummings, which is a very interesting and insightful modern poem that depicts the pivotal moment of our childhood. The poem is visually very interesting and complex, almost as if the words are dancing across the page as if to signify the children in the poem playfully frolicking and leaping around. In analyzing this poem, I find that in an effort to vividly depict children’s transformation from lighthearted and jolly innocence to the sexual implication of adulthood, cummings explores the necessary and timely course of nature that every child endures. Moreover, I think in “in Just—,” cummings reiterates this momentous milestone in every child’s life also by emphasizing the seasonal aspect of this transition in the poem, which is springtime. This season definitely validates a sense of renewal, growth, and enlightenment that takes place throughout the poem for boys and girls.

Cummings vividly captures the fundamental moment in children’s lives by embodying the nature of this shift through varied structure and meaningful repetition. In the first stanza, cummings simply writes "in Just-/spring" which is such an impactful word in it of itself. Not only is this phrase alluding to the title of the poem, but it also possesses some level of ambiguity as we are not certain whether it means exactly or precisely in spring, or whether he means unjust spring, as if spring (and this sexual transformation) is unfair and undeserved. Then the way in which cummings arranges the structure of the phrase, “when the world is mud-/luscious” is unanticipated. Cummings’ clever arrangement of these words signify that “the world is mud-“ is somewhat given in a negative context, until it is paired with the word “luscious” which is more delightful and seems to be meant to encompass a childlike fantasy and playfulness in regards to spring. Then, we are introduced to the “little/lame balloonman” for the first time, who “whistles far and wee,” similar to the Pied Piper. Once the seemingly menacing and untrustworthy balloonman whistles, “eddieandbill come/ running from marbles,”which signifies their desertion of their innocence since they are running from their innocent childhood games and advancing towards the balloonman, which could denote their newfound sexuality.

In the next few stanzas, cummings reexamines the crucial and indispensable transition from youth to mature adulthood by employing repetition and altered structure. Cummings writes that the “world is puddle-“ which, like mud, also has a repulsive and unpleasant connotation. However, he goes on to clarify that it is “puddle-wonderful,” suddenly giving the word a whole new meaning, as it could suggest the enjoyable and joyful aspect of infancy and innocence, especially because “it’s spring.” Cummings purposefully incorporates repetition throughout the poem when he mentions “the queer/old balloonman,” which once again, is undermined by sexual implications as we get the sensation that this possibly homosexual, aged man is wicked and deceiving as he lures the children in. Subsequently, as soon as the balloonman sounds his whistle, “bettyandisbel come dancing/from hop-scotch,” which serves to manifest that the children are shedding their innocence and furthering themselves from their childish pursuits in order to encounter the balloonman, and therefore, their adult sexuality. Through varied structure and intricate repetition, cummings exemplifies the nature of children’s transformation from childhood to adulthood as they are led by the “goat-footed/balloonMan,” which could be an allusion to Pan, the Greek sex god. Overall, in “in Just—,”cummings presents the complexity of abandoning childish pursuits in order to achieve adulthood and sexual awakening as a paramount aspect of life.

Grendel: The True Character of a Gruesome Monster

Overall, I think Grendel by John Gardner is truly a compelling novel that is truly engaging and captivating in its entirety.  I am most definitely a fan of this novel because Gardner’s Grendel never fails to surprise me or shock me continuously. Although many of the philosophies presented throughout the book are exceptionally complex and oftentimes perplexing, Gardner’s writing style definitely engages me to think outside the box and to read between the lines in order to discern the meaning of the novel, just as Grendel is trying to discern the meaning of the universe and his role in it.

With that said, there are many aspects of the novel that are worth addressing such as Grendel’s constantly transforming thoughts and impressions about art. The role of art and the artist in the novel is largely significant throughout the text as Grendel jumps back and forth between the dragon’s ideals and mankind’s enduring beliefs. I think it is so interesting that Grendel falls somewhere between humanity and in a sense, godliness. It is definitely no coincidence that Grendel possesses this impenetrable charm in Ch. 6 that renders him invincible in a way, like God. Throughout the novel, we get the sense that Grendel is just trying to understand the world and how it works, and where he belongs in it, just on a whole other level. We see Grendel still trying to define himself in comparison to humans and their world, then in contrast to the dragon and the infinite universe, then in terms of Grendel himself as a mechanical creature…an animal.

The shift in Grendel’s notions and philosophies regarding his own existence are evident throughout the novel. Initially, Grendel has no concept of the world outside his own mother, who to him, is the source of his being. It is not until Grendel’s monumental realization of his independence (when he gets stuck in the tree in Ch. 2) that we see his impressions of the world transform and modify. Soon enough, Grendel comes to realize the “meaningless objectness of the world, the universal bruteness” of it (Gardner 28). Grendel gradually develops his theory of solipsism, in which he is convinced that only he exists and that everything around him is merely a fabrication of his own mind, and nonexistent.

However, after a brief lapse in Grendel’s notion of good vs. evil through the Shaper’s persuasive art, Grendel’s beliefs quickly change when Grendel encounters the dragon in Ch. 5 (which is arguably his own unconscious mind). After his encounter with the dragon, Grendel is convinced of the dragon’s belief that the duration of time ceases to prolong the importance of things that are important now.  The dragon alters Grendel’s beliefs from being primarily based on solipsism to now centering on nihilism and the idea that everything is unimportant and doomed to perish eventually in the grand scheme of things. This theory resonates with Grendel for a long time (especially throughout Ch. 7), as he progressively builds on the dragon’s ideas and comes to many realizations of his own.

Eventually, he comes to assume his role as the ultimate monster and destroyer of society…he accepts his role as the enemy, the ruiner, the cursed creature. Although Grendel’s notions of art continue to develop incredibly fast throughout chapter 9 and 10, he is still somehow bound to humanity through this mutual recognition of art and its impact.

John Gardner's Monstrous Creation: Grendel

After our brief introduction to John Gardner’s contemporary fiction novel, Grendel, I was curious to see how (according to Gardner) fiction should truly be written: with a purpose. Initially, I did not really regard Gardner to be the gentlest of people, considering that he bashed the majority of fiction writers by degrading their works and everything they have ever achieved in their lifetime. However, after reading the first couple chapters of Grendel, I’m kind of starting to see the more sympathetic side of Gardner and the regret and guilt he felt due to his liability in his brother’s unprecedented death.

Truthfully, I do not blame Gardner for defending his beliefs that fiction should solely be life-affirming and significant, not meaningless and empty. Although I admit he could have been a little less harsh and disrespectful to other writers, his genuine concern for the importance and profound meaning of fiction actually seems valid. With that said, I think it is perfectly acceptable to have any form of fictional work whether it is momentous or not. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and interpretations of fictional merit, but for some reason I can’t help but agree with Gardner in his declaration that a worthwhile piece of literature is so much more inspirational and encouraging to readers than a work of fiction that possesses no relevance to real life at all.

In any case, I am thoroughly enjoying his concoction of the “evil” creature Grendel, who is frequently considered to be an abominable monster who wreaks havoc upon the innocent residents of Denmark in the epic Beowulf. I love the fact that Gardner explores Grendel’s side of the story as an outsider who struggles to discern the meaning of life and his purpose in the universe. I think Gardner makes Grendel’s character very relatable on many levels (which seems highly unexpected actually), as he considers himself an ugly, worthless, detested, and  undesirable creature who has no meaning or sense of belonging in the world. Grendel is a very self-loathing and insecure monster who calls himself a “ridiculous hairy creature” (Gardner 44), who oftentimes cannot bear the existence of other “natural things” like humans (Gardner 8), specifically the Danes.

I found it extremely significant to note that Gardner choses to develop Grendel’s character almost as an equal and an opposite to mankind. This is because Grendel shares a common language with humans, but his efforts to communicate remain futile, as the humans neglect to understand the creature. At the same time, Grendel’s feelings and emotional states also resembles that of humans, such as sentiments of loneliness, despair, pain, and fear. Furthermore, Grendel’s similarities with humans are only overshadowed by their differences that seem to thwart Grendel’s endeavors to befriend them. Thus, as Grendel struggles to discover his identity and role in this chaotic world, we see Gardner unravel the true nature of a lost and self-doubting soul who seeks to discover a sense of community and belonging to the world.

The Hero's Journey (the Joseph Campbell version)

Today we were briefly introduced to the scope of the hero’s journey and how this encompasses a prevalent and common archetype in countless myths, even from the beginning of time (from the time when the Epic of Gilgamesh was engraved on stone tablets, as Mrs. Clinch says). I found John Campbell’s profound interpretation of this hero’s journey to be extremely enlightening and noteworthy, as I can now see this depiction of the archetypal hero in pop culture’s most epic stories such as Star Wars and Harry Potter in a way I never have before. Campbell’s theory regarding the explicit stages which a typical hero undergoes is referenced in The Hero with a Thousand Faces, the book that Campbell wrote in order to accentuate the connection between modern psychology and a more thorough understanding of ancient mythology. I think this depiction of a true hero is already so commonly accepted in society (like Christ) that we don’t even realize its significance until it is clearly presented to us in the form of a set structure or “sequence of events” if you will.

For instance, how many die-hard Harry Potter fans immediately recognize Dobby as a helper/amulet (one of the stages of the hero’s journey) in Harry’s heroic adventure? Or that Dumbledore is the wise old mentor who serves as the source of courage and wisdom for Harry? Or that Hagrid is technically the herald in the hero’s journey, as he is the one who brings the call to adventure by telling Harry he is a wizard, opening up the possibilities of a whole new realm of existence (wizarding world)? Perhaps initially we don’t identify Professor Lupin as a shapeshifter, Draco Malfoy as one of the threshold guardians, or Voldemort as the shadow, but once we are presented with these ideas, it is much easier to distinguish and associate the characters to the typical archetypes of a hero’s journey.

In the interview with Joseph Campbell that we watched in class, Campbell explains the duration of the hero’s journey as something of a cycle, in which the hero must ultimately make a massive sacrifice for the sake and of others, whether that be spiritually or physically, in order to undergo this heroic transformation to consciousness and understanding. In some aspects, the hero’s journey is comprised of many psychological references and concepts. The hero/heroine not only must face physical obstacles and impediments he/she is presented with such as a monster or a dark force, but he/she must also learn to overcome his/her inherent and mental  obstructions such as fear and a dramatic, unanticipated change. It is not until one discovers and overcomes one’s internal conflict of opposing feelings and thoughts that one can truly achieve some great deed that renders one a hero.

In addition to the psychological realization that a hero must endure, Campbell addresses other various aspects of the hero’s journey in the interview, such as the three stages usually contained within all myths: departure, fulfillment/initiation, and return, which together epitomize the entire span of the hero’s journey. Campbell emphasizes the importance of these three crucial points of the hero’s journey as they essentially structure the entire course of the hero’s journey.

Overall, I think Joseph Campbell’s depiction of the hero’s journey is extremely interesting and meaningful, and I look forward to applying these concepts in our analysis of literary works. J

Shutter Island vs. One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest

Despite the fact that I have been so incredibly busy and overwhelmed with homework this week, I still managed to take a little time for myself to watch a movie. So, instead of the usual comedy or typical cliché drama, I decided to with a mystery/psychological thriller: Shutter Island. Not only did this suspenseful and perplexing film immediately spark my interest in its ominous and eerie nature, but it also displayed some similar qualities as the novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey.

Appropriately titled, this movie is about a U.S. marshal, Teddy Daniels, and his partner Chuck Aule, who travel to Ashecliff Hospital on Shutter Island to investigate the disappearance of a criminally insane patient, Rachel Solando. Shortly after their arrival on this ghostly and foreboding island, Teddy finds himself questioning the strange doctors who are in charge of the hospital and its mentally-ill prisoners, including the psychiatrist Dr. John Cawley, who seems very suspicious from the start. In an effort to solve this mysterious case, Teddy finds himself trapped on the island by a violent storm, as he becomes conflicted with disturbing instances of his past as a former WWII veteran, while also suffering from delusions of his deceased wife Dolores, whom he believes was killed by a man named Andrew Laeddis. The tension mounts when Teddy finds himself discovering clues to the mystery of Rachel Solando and what he believes to be the secret conspiracies behind the hospital’s classified experiments. As the thrilling plot unravels, Teddy’s paranoia grows until he is ultimately faced with the truth behind his past as he begins to question everyone and everything on this island—including his own sanity.

Like this creepy and riveting movie, Cuckoo’s Nest possesses a similar mental hospital setting that seems to drive the characters more insane and psychotic than they were to begin with. Although Shutter Island and Cuckoo’s Nest encompass very different plots and themes, there are still some prevalent parallels between the two works.

First of all, the main characters, Teddy in Shutter Island and Randle McMurphy in Cuckoo’s Nest, both seem to be rather sane and rational initially, until they are somehow forced into confinement at a mental hospital, as they are surrounded with patients who are mentally-ill (and prisoners in Teddy’s case). In this respect, I think many aspects of Cuckoo’s Nest resemble those of the film as well, except that the movie is much darker and more peculiar than the novel. In any case, the chief of the hospital in Shutter Island, Dr. Cawley, is much like Nurse Ratched, the oppressive and heartless woman who demands authority and runs the mental hospital in Cuckoo’s Nest. Both of these characters come off as though they are trying to help the patients recover, when in reality, they are both secretly tormenting the patients through their domineering and manipulative ways.

Additionally, in both the book and the movie, the two main characters undergo some form of self-realization and personality change that both mount to completely unexpected plot twists, thus altering the endings. In the movie, Teddy is essentially on the path of self-discovery, as he is forced to accept that he is Andrew Laeddis, his wife’s murderer, and that he is actually one of the disturbed and psychotic patients of Ashecliff Hospital. This surprising and completely unexpected plot twist led me to reconsider and question the whole movie, as I did for Cuckoo’s Nest, when McMurphy is forcibly lobotomized under Nurse Ratched’s orders, for his rebellion and aggressive behavior, in a final effort to exert her tyrannical powers and authority over McMurphy. In both cases, the movie and the novel, the main characters undergo a prefrontal lobotomy in the end, which ultimately symbolizes the demise and the defeat of both Teddy Daniels and Randle McMurphy.

Short Story Analysis: Reflection on My Paper

Overall, I am pretty pleased with my short story analysis paper on “Teenage Wasteland” by Anne Tyler. I do think, however, that there are some weaknesses throughout my paper that could have been avoided altogether. Throughout my paper, I tend to resort to the emphasis on Cal’s corrupt character rather than effectively demonstrating the “loss of innocence in vulnerable youths” through Donny's character. I could have incorporated more analysis on Tyler's characterization of Donny in addition to Cal, in order to capture the meaning of the work as a whole, in terms of Tyler’s “so what.”

Also, I agree that I need more support to substantiate my claim about Cal’s destructive influence on Donny in the story, and how that ultimately manifests in Donny’s escape/downfall. I also need support for proving the “cracked foundation” of the Coble family because I neglected to provide evidence of the tension between Donny and his parents. In my argument about Donny’s compliance to evil and Cal’s “teenage wasteland,” I was very vague about how Donny’s corruption came to be. For example, in my third paragraph (second body paragraph), I discuss Donny’s “submission to sin and corruption,” but I don’t go into detail about how this is done or when this takes place. I could’ve used the example when Daisy is notified of Donny’s progressing unsatisfactory performance in school which occurs under Cal’s supervision and “mentoring.”There are many instances throughout the text that can corroborate this negative influence that Cal has on Donny throughout the story.

Additionally, most of the comments I received on my paper addressed the insufficient and lack of support/evidence that I need in order to fully develop my idea and to prove my thesis. I was unable to effectively demonstrate Cal’s motives in the grand scheme of things, and how that exactly leads to Donny’s corruption. I agree with Mrs. Clinch, there are many gaps, or loose ends that need to be tied, in my story, which I could have probably easily done just simply by using more TEXT SUPPORT! I think I could’ve done such a better job in tying my claims back to my thesis and Tyler’s “so what.” I don’t know why I was reluctant to include more evidence throughout my paper because it does seem like I am making assumptions about Cal’s rapacious nature just by notciting more text.

For the most part, I wrote more about “what” and failed to acknowledge the “how” in the story. I needed to address HOW Cal is manipulative and HOW Donny losses his innocence, not just that he did. I make a lot of unconvincing and inadequate statements regarding Cal’s character throughout my paper without actually proving HOW he is like a vampire. I merely accused Cal of being one without actually proving it, or his motives in that case. In effect, I agree that I had a great argument and interesting assertions, but I should have put more focus on how my claims can be seen in Tyler’s story.