Chapter 4 in All the King’s Men is essentially a trip to the past, as we are introduced to a Jack Warden from the past, the graduate student “working for his Ph.D. in American History” at the State University of his unnamed and unidentified home state, which frustratingly remains unspecified throughout the book. This particular chapter also incorporates some third person point of view narrative style, as Jack is temporarily no longer the chief narrator interestingly enough.
Nonetheless, Warren weaves this intricate web of what
emerges to be the focus of Jack Burden’s first excursion into the past which
Jack renders to be unsuccessful as he was unable to comprehend Cass Mastern’s
motives and true intentions in the grand scheme of things. Then, Jack goes on to
explain that the reason he ceased his research in the excursion of Cass Mastern’s
history was merely because he became too immersed in trying to “discover the
truth and not the facts,” that he found it almost unbearable to continue the
assignment.
The chapter initially introduces Jack’s disappointing and
unsatisfactory college life. This is described in detail by the mysterious
narrator who depicts Jack’s college-student self as, in a nutshell, invulnerable
to everything, which is potentially “the curse of Jack Burden.” On a side note,
I found the irony in this line particularly amusing considering the fact that
Jack’s last name is Burden (like an inconvenience or a bother), and he is
cursed with being invulnerable. After a quick introduction to the context of
Jack’s fascination with Cass Mastern as a college graduate student, Warren
launches into this elaborate description of Jack’s initial excursion as Jack
recalls the facts that he discovered about this man in his “historical research”
of what he considers simply “a job,” when it is clearly more significant than
that.
Later, Cass Mastern’s character is defined to be one of the
two uncles of Jack’s father, Ellis Burden, aka the Scholarly Attorney. Gradually,
Cass’s life is slowly unveiled as the story reverses back to the late 1800s,
when Cass was just a young man who winds up in Lexington, Kentucky, and finds that
“there is an education for vice as well as for virtue.” Soon enough, Cass greets one of his close
friends, Mr. Duncan Trice, who happens to live a very wealthy and opulent
lifestyle. Shortly after encountering Mr. Trice’s wife, Annabelle Trice (aka “the
pursuer”), Cass is mesmerized by her beauty and her goddess-like persona. From
the beginning, we see the influence that Annabelle has on Cass, as they engage
in a scandalous affair that ultimately results in Duncan Trice’s suicide. The
secrecy and deception behind Cass and Annabelle’s affair is very similar, and
almost parallel to the private relationship between Sadie and Willie Stark in
the novel. However, I keep finding contradictions that oppose this theory
because Annabelle’s manipulation is disguised by her luring and seductive
figure that entices Cass in his naivety. This is considerably different from
Sadie’s brazen, self-assured, and assertive character that is depicted as
dangerous to Willie’s morals and goodness. Overall, I am still perplexed by
Annabelle’s and Cass’s role in the chapter as I’m trying to discern whether Annabelle
is a symbol of appeal and temptation or not, and whether Cass is inherently
good or not. In essence, a lot of the contradictions and contrasts seen in
these two characters can also be seen in Jack and Willie’s innate natures.
No comments:
Post a Comment